Outlander If Not For Hope and Providence Review
Starz’s Outlander: Season 4, Episode 11: If Not For Hope and Outlander: Season 4, Episode 12: Providence reviews. This article has been split into two parts. Click on “Next Page” at the bottom to read the second review.
Outlander If Not For Hope Review
Brianna “Bree” Randall Fraser (Sophie Skelton) catching Lord Grey in the act of coitus is the best moment of Brianna’s stay in Jocasta MacKenzie Cameron (Maria Doyle Kennedy)’s household, though Brianna did not know it at the time. Lord Grey, because of his sexuality, because of what he would never seek from her, is Brianna’s safe harbor in the growing storm of Aunt Jocasta’s household and the hungry wolves that prowl it (beckoned by Jocasta’s bell) looking for a suitable and pulchritude bride.
The impromptu dinner party in If Not For Hope is illuminating, humorous, and hard to watch. The latter comes from Brianna’s potential suitors falling all over themselves to garner her attention, impress her, and place themselves in the forefront of her mind i.e. her eventual thoughts about a suitable husband. Of all the suitors, Gerald Forbes (Billy Boyd) is absolutely embarrassing, creating cringe-worthy moment after cringe-worthy moment during the episode. The viewer gets it, Forbes thinks Brianna is pretty, alluring, someone that he could not normally acquire it weren’t for his riches, estate, and good standing in the community. What Forbes lacks is: reserve, charm, patience, and shame. He does seem like a good person, however, kind, and generous. I can’t imagine that he would ever deny Brianna anything. He would give her whatever her heart desired. The problem for all the suitors is that a.) Brianna’s heart belongs to someone else and b.) the true purpose of the dinner party is something that Brianna knows nothing about and does not condone.
Because of these facts, the endeavor would have been doomed from the beginning, at least in the way that its architect, Jocasta, initially hopes for (save for Gerald Forbes’ proposal), if it weren’t for Brianna’s ingenuity.
Asking Lord John Grey (David Berry) to marry her is a clever, strategic move on Brianna’s part in If Not For Hope – she can keep her vows to her hand-fasted husband and protect herself from the ere of 1700 American society as an unmarried, pregnant woman. Lord Grey eventually realizes that doing right thing for the wrongs reasons is what is necessary in the moment. His eleventh hour save is quite unexpected but completely within character. Lord Grey is already protecting one of Jamie Fraser’s children with his name, presence, and household. Protecting another one of Jamie’s children, a child in need, is second nature to Grey (after his conscience is buggered by the consequences of not helping her and what that will mean for her). Protecting Jamie’s children is the closet that Grey will ever come to Jamie. In Grey’s situation, something from his unrequited love, a part of Jamie i.e. guardianship of his progeny, is better than nothing at all. Through these continuous acts of kindness on Lord Grey’s part, Grey gets to stay in and apart of Jamie’s life while earning Jamie’s undying gratitude. Though done out genuine goodness and selflessness, I am sure these ramifications have not escaped Lord Grey’s acute perception one iota.
Jocasta congratulating Brianna for cultivating the favor of a visiting lord and garnering a marriage proposal from him in the course of an single evening is intriguing. Jocasta can’t see Lord Grey (figuratively speaking), not the real Lord Grey. Very few people can (his mask is that complete). All Jocasta ‘sees’ is his manner, his adherence to form, his title, and the way other people react to him. Jocasta sees the intangibles of Lord Grey but she is also an extremely practical person i.e. Lord Grey presents a wealthy and prestigious household whose union with her family may bestow all of these things and title on Brianna. Though Brianna does not see all of this at the moment, Jocasta can.
The strained relationship of Dr. Claire Fraser (Caitriona Balfe) and Jamie in If Not For Hope is symbolic of the strained relationship between Brianna and Jamie. Jamie had not only the situation that he created with Claire because of his lie to deal with, he had the “savage” remark by Brianna bouncing through his head. Claire’s explanation of her part in the Roger disaster (i.e. keeping Brianna’s confidence) is necessary and soothing but it is when Claire speaks about saying spiteful things in anger, that lights hope again in Jamie for continuing, someday, his positive relationship with Brianna.
When Murtagh Fitzgibbons Fraser (Duncan Lacroix)’s face begins to be recognized by the local authorities, he cleverly makes sure that if the situation goes completely south, that he takes Stephen Bonnet down with him. The trick with Claudel “Fergus” Fraser (César Domboy) is good but why didn’t Murtagh just leave Bonnet and exfiltrate as well? Bonnet would have been on to him if Murtagh tried to recapture him, Bonnet would know his face, but Murtagh would be free. Now Murtagh is a captured man, now the local authorities don’t have to use artist renderings to recognize Murtagh. They will have their living memories of his actual face. Perhaps Bonnet being brought to justice is more important to Murtagh than his own liberty and life.
Roger Wakefield MacKenzie (Richard Rankin) must have known that he couldn’t survive in the wild by himself for long and voluntarily went back to the Mohawk. He stayed in the past for one reason and one reason only – Brianna. The resolve on Roger’s face as he is beaten by the Mohawk (an attempt to ‘jump in’ Roger into Mohawk society I believe) and he keeps getting back up, speaks to Roger’s reconstituting fortitude. It is fitting that the episode ends with that segment. It left the viewer with the feeling of how love can drive and empower a person when they need extra motivation to keep going.
Table of Contents
Outlander Providence Review
Roger’s trials at the Mohawk village are harrowing but his time with Father Alexandre Ferigault (Yan Tual) are the pinnacle of his story-line in Providence. Father Ferigault is a mirror for Roger but one of extremes: Roger and Alexandre both have known a profound love in their life but Alexandre’s love of God and his vows are leading him to the gallows. Roger and Alexandre have both been brought to the point of breaking by the torments generated by their respective loves but Alexandre actually decides to give up and run, Roger having gotten through to him momentarily. Whether Alexandre decided to abscond to a fellow priest to ask for absolution or to runaway with his beloved and their child, it is never made clear. When Alexandre decides to dig alongside Roger, he has secretly decided on one of those paths. When dawn returns, so has Father Ferigault’s stubborn resolve, fueled by the desire to uphold his vows.
It takes a little longer for Roger’s beleaguered resolve to fully return, since acting against self-interest is extremely difficult, especially with one’s freedom at stake, but Roger eventually reverts back to his true self. Roger’s action with the fire accelerant can get him killed but he does it anyway, because another human-being is suffering and its the right thing to do.
When Johiehon (Sera-Lys McArthur) kills herself for love, to be with the love of her life for eternity, it affects all that see it, especially Roger. Roger sees the fiery face of true love in that terrible moment. He recognizes it. It is what burns in his heart. The deaths of Johiehon and Father Ferigault complete Roger’s reversion. As Roger is led away from the impromptu pyre, he is fully himself again, pre-time travel, per horrors of 1770 America.
Brianna going to see Stephen Bonnet in jail is one of the bravest things that I have seen in this TV series. The swirl of turbulent emotions and memories that hit Brianna as she walks down that short hallway (which must seem like a mile to her) were untold but have to be gargantuan. Reynald de Chatillon in the Director’s Cut of Kingdom of Heaven makes a very specific quip about a female character when that character does something dark and remarkable in the film. That quote is what I thought of when Brianna visits her rapist alone in Providence – “That woman has more back-bone than I do.”
Brianna’s time with Bonnet in the cell during Providence is also dark and remarkable.
The walk and the references to the rape were the dark parts of the Brianna / Bonnet scene. The remarkable part of the scene is that Brianna wants Bonnet to die with the knowledge that a part of him will still exist in the world (in the hopes that this will bring him some measure of solace). This is magnanimity and graciousness on the level of senior Vatican clergy. It’s so profound that it and Brianna’s other words crack Bonnet’s cold exterior, his disbelief that the child in Brianna’s belly is his. This prompts Bonnet to commit one of the most selfless acts of his life (speculation) and lookout for someone else’s needs above his own.
I formerly thought that Stephen Bonnet was a psychopath. I was wrong. He is just a self-centered, low-empathy, low-morals evil-doer. From Bonnet’s action, giving the ruby to Brianna, it seems Bonnet can feel a full range of emotions, including parental feelings.
Murtagh’s escape from prison at the hands of Fergus is entertaining with a dash of the absurd. Lord John Grey, a trained soldier and commander of men, turning his back to an open room full of rogues is lunacy. No trained soldier would ever do that. Lord Grey left himself wide open to being: a.) shot, b.) stabbed, or c.) bludgeoned from behind. After Lord Grey grabbed the lout, why didn’t he immediately turn and put his own back to a wall (so that no one could sneak up behind him), his captive his body-shield to the open room? It is a minor character inconsistency but it is noticeable and unfortunate. This small scene would have been so much better if Lord Grey’s soldier training and associated experience were on full display.
Whether Stephen Bonnet got out of the jail before the explosion or not is another matter. It doesn’t seem conceivable that he could since the jail only has one way in or out but if Bonnet hide in a corner furthest away from the explosion then immediately after the explosion, when everyone was disorientated, made his escape through the front door of the jail, its possible. I doubt Outlander‘s producers would introduce such a deplorable character that wrecks havoc on the lives of the main characters only to kill him off-screen. None of the major villains have died off-screen on Outlander and I doubt that they will start with Bonnet.
Leave your thoughts on this Outlander If Not For Hope review, Outlander Providence review, and these episodes of Outlander below in the comments section. Readers seeking more Outlander can visit our Outlander Page, our Outlander Facebook, and our Outlander Google+ Page. Readers seeking more TV show reviews can visit our TV Show Review Page, our TV Show Review Twitter Page, our TV Show Review Facebook Page, and our TV Show Review Google+ Page. Want up-to-the-minute notification? FilmBook staff members publish articles by Email, Twitter, Tumblr, Google+, and Facebook.